Pick your tune, then read

Total Pageviews

Thursday, December 31, 2009

FOR AULD LANG SYNE

It's resolution time, a last shot from 2009 for 2010:

May the stimulus and the bankers work in concert to restart the economy and jobs, jobs, jobs.

May we begin to see cooperation and a united front of action between Homeland Security and all the governmental agencies involved in terrorism so that the left hand will know what the right is doing.


May we see the beginning of peace in the Middle East, a decrease in the appeal of the radical Muslim elements, progress in Afghanistan and withdrawal from Iraq.


On a personal note:


May I finish my office in the basement of our house.


May my kids all keep working and/or find new jobs.

May the Cleveland Browns and the Cincinnati Reds make me proud again.


I don't want to be greedy. These will do for openers.

HAPPY NEW YEAR,

Tuesday, December 29, 2009

A VERBAL SHOT HEARD ROUND THE WORLD

Better than any words I can pen is this clever poem from the Financial Times. It sums up a lot of my frustrations with "The Wonderful World of High Finance". My English sister-in-law sent it to me---thank you, Angela!

Here's the link---enjoy!

And Happy New Year!

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/d3977b0e-f3eb-11de-ac55-00144feab49a,_i_email=y.html

Monday, December 21, 2009

LOOKING BACK AND HOPING FORWARD

It's that frenzied time of year with everyone scurrying to be ready for Christmas and to clean up end-of-year details. It is also a time to be retrospective.

2009 has been, to understate it, challenging and scary. The economy, although suppposedly showing signs of a revived pulse, is still suffering severe unemployment, foreclosures and heart-rending economic problems for many families. The health care issue and the machinations thereof in Congress are mind-boggling, and I, for one, don't know what the hell kind of plan we are going to end up with. Our new President is besieged with these problems, intensified by a right-wing of naysayers who fight him on almost every initiative and offer little in the way of even minimal cooperation. He has stumbled on several occasions of his own doing and suffered sometime from overexposure. Recently he has righted himself and shown signs of assertive leadership.

The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, especially the latter, are deep thorns in our sides, bleeding and paining us. Reluctantly, I accept the President's decision to increase the troop levels and pray that the tactics will work. At this point, to pull out completely would only exacerbate the problems of the Middle East and Asia. Iran and Israel are powder kegs. The extreme factions of the Muslim world continue to create deep divisions and problems for the world. It ain't a pretty picture...

As a member of the "glass half-full" school of positive thinking, I still hope that American leadership in the world can and will prevail. My most fervent wish for the New Year is that we can find a way to bury our divisions and work together to deal with our many domestic and international problems. In the words of Hamlet, "Tis a consummation devoutly to be wished."

Happy holidays to you all.

Tuesday, December 15, 2009

TWISTING THE TIGER'S TAIL (OR TALE)

Enough already! Don't you think the subject of Tiger Wood's "transgressions" or infidelities has been exhausted? Even if thirty-two new amoratae surface to stir the sexpot even more, so what's new?

I guess it's human nature for us lesser mortals to enjoy the downfall of a man "from high estate", Aristotle's definition of tragedy. We love to roll in it, smear it around and toss it back and forth. I don't justify his behaviour, but not many of us have been icons of sport and public notice and exposed to the temptations in and scrutiny of our private lives such as he has endured.

O.K., we've all had our laughs, made our little jokes and cackled. Now let the man try to piece his marriage back together and get on with a very changed life. It's going to be a long and rocky trip, I suspect---and probably expensive, as well.

I wonder what it will do to his game...

Saturday, December 12, 2009

IT'S GOOD TO BE A PROUD AMERICAN AGAIN

I quote our President in his eloquent and historic Nobel Prize acceptamce speech:

"I face the world as it is, and cannot stand idle in the face of threats to the American people.
A non-violent movement could not have halted Hitler's armies. Negotiations cannot convince al Qaeda's leaders to lay down their arms. To say that force is sometimes necessary is not a call to cynicism it is a recognition of history; the imperfections of man and the limits of reason.
I raise this point because in many countries there is a deep ambivalence about military action today, no matter the cause. At times, this is joined by a reflexive suspicion of America, the world's sole military superpower.

Yet the world must remember that it was not simply international institutions not just treaties and declarationst that brought stability to a post-World War II world. Whatever mistakes we have made, the plain fact is this: the United States of America has helped underwrite global security for more than six decades with the blood of our citizens and the strength of our arms.
So yes, the instruments of war do have a role to play in preserving the peace. And yet this truth must coexist with another that no matter how justified, war promises human tragedy. The soldier's courage and sacrifice is full of glory, expressing devotion to country, to cause and to comrades in arms. But war itself is never glorious, and we must never trumpet it as such."

Once again, at a crucial moment, Barack Obama stood up and said what needed to be said, much as he did when the time came to face the "race" problem during his Presidential campaign when he delivered another profound and encompassing analysis of the problem. His Oslo speech was deeply philosophic, wide ranging, and combined idealism with pragmatism. As one would expect, it was not greeted with tumultuous applause with a basically pacifistic audience who, as he noted, were highly suspicious of American past action. Agree with him or not, he was a statesman who stated his position with dignity, erudition and honor.

I hope you were as proud of him as I.

Friday, December 4, 2009

MY CHRISTMAS SPORTS WISH LIST

I wish:

Serena Williams would shut the f---- up and pay her fine.

Coaches would stop yakking about their “student athletes” and just call a spade a spade--- trainees for the N.F.L, N.B.A. and M.L.B.

The N.C.A.A. would cut the B.C.S. bullshit and go to an 8-team playoff by cutting the regular season to 10 or 11 games and then holding playoffs the next two weeks and the championship on New Year’s (or thereabout).

Replays were part of every major sport---but with reasonable limits.

Sports writers were limited to 200 words or less per articles.

TV Sports commentators would appreciate the golden sound of occasional silence.

The tennis season was shortened by two months.

Baseball would go back to 154 games so the season won’t creep into November.

Baseball would stop calling it “The World Series” and call it “The National Championship Series (N.C.S.)---unless they invite international teams, like Cuba and Japan, and play it off.

Teachers could be paid at least 10% of professional athletes’ salaries.

Tiger Woods would keep his woods (and long irons) in his pants.

All of us interested and/or involved in sports could remember it’s still a game and not critical to life support.

That’ll do for starters.

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

HOBSON'S CHOICE

Finally, the long wait is over and the President has made known his proposed Afghanistan policy. It was a good speech, delivered with authority and credibility, that of a man who has been through a long deliberative process from which he has forged his plan.


As expected and totally predictable, critics from the right and left used their blowguns to assault this "no-win-no-clear-moral imperative" policy. Whatever the President says, he is wrong to somebody. One critic referred to "platitudes"; another to "same old, same old".


I respect John McCain's concern that putting a timetable on our withdrawal can play into the Taliban's hands. On the other hand, if the President failed to make clear some kind of exit strategy, he would play into the hands of the increasing numbers against the continuation of the war, not to mention putting the current Afghan administration on notice that they are expected to maximize their efforts to deal with their problems in an efficient, non-corruptive way.


You have "the minimalists" who think we should do as little as possible in American involvement and emphasize playing up to creating divisions in the war lords to fight the Taliban on a local level. The Vice-President and Tom Friedman, to name two, both with international expertise, seem to favor this course of action. On the other extreme, you have General McChrystal and many Republican hawks, who think 40,000 troops a necessity. (I might add, if Obama had said 40,000, then many Republicans would have probably opted for 50,000! Whatever he suggests is automatically wrong.)


Involving and working with Pakistan, making them "partners", as the President stated, is essential. If we don't have their total support in pursuing the Taliban and Al-Quaeda operatives who find safe haven in the hill country next to Afghanistan, we can't possibly change the course of this war.


Equally essential is the deeper involvement of the other NATO forces to take on a larger share of troop responsibility. I note that Nicholas Sarkozy refuses to involve French troops. I wonder what he would do if the disproportionately large Muslim population of France suddenly created even deeper civil war in the form of suicide bombings in Paris, for example.


It is truly Hobson's Choice with no clear facile answers. I think we need to give the President our support and give this plan a fair chance.

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

ARE WE CREATING A CAMEL?

Here we go again. The big health care debate in the Senate is underway. A recent report from the Congressional Budget Office shows that the cost of health care for the vast majority of Americans will go down if the Senate bill is passed. Of course, the Republicans, as is their wont, find the one area of covered Americans whose premiums will rise and jump all over the bill with both feet. The fact that this one area represents less than 20% and that the other 80% will have their costs reduced doesn't mean crap to these negative thinkers.


I almost shudder when I contemplate what the final bill---if it ever passes---will look like when a zillion amendments and modifications are made to placate the majority. It will probably resemble the classic definition of a camel: a horse designed by a committee.


"Hope springs eternal in the human breast" is the watchword for all of us viewing from the sidelines. Let's hope we get something where the majority are covered and we can shed our reputation as the only major world power without a health plan.

Friday, November 20, 2009

THANKSGIVING MEDITATION

My wife and I belong to a Wednesday Worship Group that meets at 6:00 p.m. for a short meditative service. It is lay-led, run by us "amateurs". I did this short meditation at the service this Wednesday. You don't have to be a Christian to appreciate Thanksgiving, so this is for all my friends and/or followers.

As we approach the actual holiday of Thanksgiving, it is a good time to take a self-inventory and examine in our lives the blessings for which we should be grateful. In this connection, I was perusing recently a book that belonged to my grandmother that came into my possession after her death in 1962, a book that I have enjoyed over these many years called “The Book of English Collects”, a collection from the Prayer Books of the Anglican Communion of England, Scotland, Ireland, Canada, South Africa and the U.S.A. published originally in 1940. Most of these collects are old and refer to God with the pronouns “Thou” or “Thee”, which appeals to me, as it denotes a special intimate relationship with God. It is filled with inspiring prayers for almost any occasion or circumstance. I recently found one Thanksgiving Collect that appealed to me:

O, Most merciful Father, we humbly thank thee for all thy gifts
so freely bestowed upon us. For life and health and safety, for power
to work and leisure to rest, for all that is beautiful in creation and in
the lives of men (and women), we praise and magnify thy glorious
name. But above all we thank thee for our spiritual mercies in Christ
Jesus our Lord, for the means of peace and the hope of glory. Fill
our hearts with all joy and peace in believing, through Christ Jesus
our lord.
Amen.

And here on Sanibel, in the words of this collect of Thanksgiving, we have so many “gifts so freely bestowed upon us” in our lives, our friendships and our church. Almost every time I drive down Periwinkle (the main drag), I find myself thanking God that Beryl and I permanently moved here seven years ago this month. We had been coming down since 1974 and owned a condo since 1977, but we bought a lot in 2001 and built and moved into our current home the following year.

We all have our “thanks giving” list. Let’s go around the circle and see what “thanks giving” we can make. I’ll start it off:

I give thanks that I have been married to this wonderful woman who has put up with me for 56 years and is the mother of our four children and grandmother to six.

(A lot of people chimed in with their thanks giving. Feel free to add your own.)

Let me end with a Collect for Thanksgiving Day:

O Most Merciful Father, who hast blessed the labors of the
husbandmen in the returns of the fruit of the earth: We give thee
humble and hearty thanks for this thy bounty, beseeching thee to
continue thy loving kindness to us, that our land may still yield
her increase, to thy glory and our comfort, through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Amen.

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

IT'S EPIDEMIC OF THE MOUTH TIME

There must be something in the autumn air, a new epidemic going around, a form of rabies with foaming at the mouth. I have recently been buried with emails from my neo-con friends, absolutely ballbusting Barack Obama. I'm used to getting several a week, but the intensity of the tone has been ramped way up recently.

Benedict Arnold looks like our greatest patriot compared to Barack Obama. Our President has sold out the country. He is a dangerous revolutionary endangering the American Way of Life. He has demeaned us abroad by talking to the Palestinians. The Iranians play him for a fool. The Chinese laugh at him. His domestic programs are a farce and all doomed. He's never held "a real job"in his life. Hell. he's not even an American! I can't believe one man can screw up in so many ways so fast.

What am I missing? Did he not inherit a few of both domestic and unternational problems from the previous administration? I do believe there were wars in Iraq and Afghanistan going on when he stepped into the Presidency. I do believe the financial crisis, the mortgage meltdown and the recession were well underway, as well. I do believe most of the world thought our foreign policy abysmal and in need of revision.

I don't think everything he has done is right, I must say. A few weeks ago I wrote a blog where I suggested he would do well to keep a lower profile and work quietly behind the scenes to effect some of his key programs. He is stirring too many pots at one time, but, with the problems he is facing, it's tough to know where to concentrate. He needs to do some pushing and shoving and the grunt work of getting programs going.

I think the idea of a summit with a variety of governmental and undustrial executives a good idea. Jobs are on everyone's mind. It is a real priority. And don't have a press conference every five minutes to update the public. Wait until you have a real program to present.

Then I think it might be possible to slow down this epidemic of mouth foaming by the right---not totally, I know that's too much to expect---but enough that reasonable people can begin to see through the fog of bombast.

Thursday, November 5, 2009

TOO FAT, TOO DUMB, TOO LAZY---TOO UNLOVED

The latest report from the military services is a real shocker: 75% of our youth today is unfit for military service. That percentage surprised me, as I would have thought the estimate to be in the 50+% range.

TOO FAT: The diet of the average American family has been the target of nutritionists for some time---adults and kids with too much junk food, too many empty calories, too much fat. I remember being resentful but understanding on a bus tour in New Zealand ten years or more ago when the bus driver, as part of his running commentary, announced as we passed a McDonald’s, “Ladies and Gentlemen, the American Embassy!”

TOO DUMB: Educators have been concerned for some time with the dumbing down of educational standards in an effort to mass-educate our youth. Quantity, not quality, becomes the hallmark of many schools. Drop-outs are still prevalent; “babysitting” classrooms where students simply occupy space too frequent. Lack of funds doesn’t help, as well.

TOO LAZY: How many kids stay active in sports? How many play outside? How many are obsessed with their video/computer games? Virtual physical reality replaces actual physical activity. I know that the computer is an essential part of the military today---but you still have to fight your enemies and you better be in better or as good shape as they.

TOO UNLOVED: Another problem for kids today is lack of family time and family values. Some of this problem can be related to the economic conditions of today where both parents are scrabbling for a living, and not much time remains to nurture family values. Some of the problem, unfortunately, can be ascribed to parents who shouldn’t be parents, who just can’t be bothered with their damned nuisance kids.

It is time for concern. The future of our country will someday be in the hands of this youth, and, if three out of four are in bad shape physically, mentally and spiritually, then we will have a far bigger problem.

Shape up or ship out, America!

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

"MONEY CAN'T BUY ME LOVE"

The election results of yesterday, November third, prove the Beatles were right. The rich candidates who spent lavishly didn't buy much love. Mayor Bloomberg of New York City won but had a much closer result than the expected landslide. Gov. Corzine of New Jersey spent a ton of his vast fortune--- and lost handily.

Some of the Republican right are beginning to crow, seeing these victories as emblematic of future gains, but I wouldn't place large bets on their predictions.

What you are seeing is the malaise of the general public at the state of the economy. Economists say the worst is over, but it takes a long time for the improvements to show in terms of better employment and overall corporate sales increases and hirings.

What I note is that the Oracle of Omaha, Warren Buffett, put his money where his mouth is and paid 34 billion for Burlington Northern, citing his faith in the railroads and the economic future of America. If someone as financially astute as Buffett has faith, we should, too.

Let's keep the faith, baby, and hold tight: the ride will get better.

Friday, October 30, 2009

A NEW POLITICAL MOTTO

I have two very conservative sons-in-law, both bright, industrious and well informed, hard workers who have achieved success by dint of individual and admirable industry, who delight in having fun with their more liberal (or moderate) father-in-law by sending him anti-Obama literature and quips. I think they shake their heads at such a poor misinformed old guy who has been seduced from the true path of Republican orthodoxy. One of them sent me a list of bumper stickers, of which one really caught my eye:

TRY BEING INFORMED

INSTEAD OF JUST OPINIONATED

As a former Republican of the ill-fated and almost defunct moderate wing, I think this is the perfect motto for the Far Right Neo-Cons who have taken over the Republican party. This group specializes in having a multitude of strong opinions but a paucity of factual information. Indeed, they have every right to their opinions, but I could respect them more if they had a factual basis for many of them.

Any deviation from the cant of their interpretation of capitalist doctrine is traitorous--and automatically makes the trespasser (oh, cursed word) a socialist. Their orthodoxy commenced about 1925 in the Cal Coolidge era and has gone through only minor transformation since. The fact that we had a minor blip called the Great Crash of '29 and the Great depression of 1930-1940 has not significantly altered their worldview.

That is why they ignore the current lessons of the Recession and the problems facing us today. Unfettered capitalism is A-OK and should be left alone to sort itself out.

That is why it's fine for us as world leaders to sustain two wars that are costing us a trillion dollars and more and putting the youth of our country at risk.

That is why it is considered criminal to admit on the world stage that some of our policies have not always worked and that it is not wrong to listen to other world opinions on occasion.

That is why it is just fine for the major world leader to be the only world power without a health plan.

I could go on. The point is, the world constantly changes. I am a believer in the free market capitalist system, but it has to change and become more responsible to the needs of the majority of people and cannot be without scrutiny and supervision to ensure that greed does not always win. Capitalism in our republic must always be in a state of flux, adjusting to different times and conditions. The Far Right refuses frequently to accept these realities. They are expert at criticizing but amateurs at suggesting concrete solutions or alternative plans.


May I suggest a new bumper sticker:

YOU MAY DISAGREE

BUT TRY TO AGREE

YOU MIGHT EVEN LIKE IT!


Monday, October 26, 2009

IT'S BIG BROTHER TIME

I noted an aricle in the Sunday NY Times regarding a case in Poole, England where a young matron with three children was objecting strenuously to the violation of her privacy rights. The Poole local school officials, suspecting the lady of falsifying her home address in order to get a daughter into a neighborhood school, commenced a covert spying operation, secretly following her around and keeping a log of her and her three children's activities and even accessing her telephone billing records. It turns out she was not breaking the law and her daughter was admitted to the school. But this lady is really feeling violated and is seeking an enquiry into this situation.

Local governments in England have a wide latitude of investigatory powers due to RIPA, the Regulatory Investigatory Powers Act, which allows them to investigate without being overseen by judges or law officers. They can nail you for such "heinous" crimes as not picking up dog poop and noise pollution as well as more serious crimes like industrial waste pollution, loan sharking and false benefit claims.

England has 20% of the surveillance cameras, the CCTVs (closed caption TVs) in world operation. It seems like there is one every twenty-five yards sometimes when you are driving in England. It is truly "the surveillance society", as the Times dubbed it.

I realize the world has changed, especially since 9/11, and we all, for good reasons, have become more paranoid and anxious about our safety. George Orwell was a real prophet in "1984", warning us of the dangers of a "Big Brother" society where an omnipotent supreme authority would be regulating our lives. Most people have no idea they are under surveillance which compounds the problem. The lady from Poole only found out about her surveillance after the fact when the school authorities summoned her to discuss her school application.

We are treading on dangerously thin moral ice when invasion of privacy reaches this level. In matters of national security you can understand the need for extra precautions, but infringing on the rights of citizens with no background of criminality is a real danger zone to human rights. Let Big Brother exercise special care.

Thursday, October 22, 2009

IT GOES WITH THE TERRITORY

Latest poll figures demonstrate, for the first time, that a majority of Americans (51%) disagree with the President. In view of the variety and complexity of issues facing the President---Afghanistan, health reform, the economy et al--such results are hardly surprising. In every President's term, you run into cyclical variations, mood swings that cover the gamut of emotional reactions.


What I really think is the President is a victim of his own doing---overexposure. In his efforts to be, like Reagan, a Great Communicator, he is being seen and heard too much and thereby losing some of his effectiveness. We need a quiet period with less press conferences and speeches, a time when he quietly meets with his advisers, works behind the scenes with his very persuasive skills to influence key congressional people and develops policies for our domestic and international problems. In this situation, silence can be golden. Then, later, he can pull an F.D.R. and present some fireside chats to the American people, which will be even more effective if followed after long silence.


He is enough of a seasoned politician to know you can't stay on an eternal high but are subject to these mood swings and variations. It is an integral part of the great game of politics. It's time, Mr. President, to take five, reflect and, to paraphrase Teddy Roosevelt, carry that big stick but, for a little while, don't even speak softly.

Tuesday, October 20, 2009

THE PECKERS ARE STILL UP

Just a brief update. Back in the spring I reported on our new "tenants'", a pair of red-headed woodpeckers, who were occupying a dead palm tree next to our house. When we returned to our home after an absence of four months, we thought they were gone: there was no sign of activity or life. Then, a couple days ago, momma stuck her head out of one of the holes and later was spied on top of the palm. HOORAY!!! We certainly did not want to lose our prized guests! It's so difficult today finding the right kind of neighbors that you want to hang on to the good ones...

Monday, October 19, 2009

I'M SO OLD I CAN REMEMBER..,

I am reminded frequently of my accumulated years by the different way things are done today. Let me give you a short list of ten:

I can remember when
  • banks made money by lending to and servicing accounts, not just by trading
  • a hand shake validated a deal
  • people talked to each other instead of screaming at each other
  • you sat down to dinner and had conversations
  • you wrote letters (called snailmail now) and shared ideas in English, not shorthand
  • a kid's idea of porno was a four-letter word on a wall
  • games were played outside in the real, not the virtual, world
  • money was earned by hard work, not financial manipulation
  • morality was an asset, not a liability
  • love was a lot more than a four letter word

I'm sure you can add to the list.

Monday, October 12, 2009

THE NOBEL PRIZE: HONOR OR ONUS?

I have mixed feelings about the Nobel Prize awarded to Barack Obama. I am a supporter of our new President, but I think this award adds unnecessary pressure to a job which is already the toughest in the world. I think it is premature in terms of expectations and results.

I understand that the Nobel committee appreciated the direction in which our President was taking us in terms of seeking international cooperation and listening to what other countries are thinking. I believe the committee was also making a political statement intended as a slap at the imperialism of the previous administration. But our new President---it's only been nine months---has not had time to effect some of the changes in thinking and philosophy he has proposed. It gives the Neo-Cons the opportunity to chortle and disparage his accomplishments, a process that has already begun.

It would have been better to have waited and given Barack Obama some time to put his varied international programs into effect. I hope and pray he will be able to do so, as I hope that the Republicans can bring themselves to think of the good of the country with positive programs and a willingness to find a middle ground for cooperation in the varied agenda of urgent needs facing us today.

I want him to have the time to prove he deserves the Nobel prize and has truly earned it. I have every confidence he will prove it.

Saturday, October 3, 2009

HOME, SWEET HOME

It's nice to be home---in America. Right now my wife and I are visiting family (a daughter and son) who live in Toledo, Ohio. We got back in time to get some really good corn on the cob, thanks to an extended season of perfect weather, the right amount of sun and rain in the proper proportion. Although we live in Florida, I was born in Ohio and still have that innate Midwestern prejudice that Midwesteners are the best: friendly, caring and generous.

Some things never change, it seems: my sports teams are as bad as ever. The Cincinnati Reds are far from a contender for the pennant, although they have ended the season on a relative high and are fighting for fourth place in their division. The Cleveland Browns are hapless, to put it as charitably as possible, and may possibly succeed the Detroit Lions as the worst team in professional football.

Another thing, unfortunately, that has not changed is the political rancor and extremes of opinions , like artillery shells being lobbed between opposing lines. Our President has commented on rudeness and lack of civility, as have I in past blogs. One of these days, we may surprise ourselves and actually hear what the opposing view is, and I hope that inspires the conflicting sides to seek a settlement.

I get annoyed at America and, when I'm in England, I'm exposed to a more international view. (I must admit, they have their share of screamers on the left and right, as well!) But the U.S.A. is still home and I love it, warts and all. Anyway, it's great to be home...

Tuesday, September 22, 2009

I DON'T THINK I'M READY FOR THIS...

This will be my last blog in 2009 from England as my wife and I are returning home to the U.S.A on Thursday. We're ready to come home, but, as I have said before, I'm not too pleased with the angry divisions tearing us apart back home. I've expressed myself on this before and no doubt will do so in the future. But let's turn to something else...


Today I read that 83 year-old Valery Giscard d'Estaing, the former President of France, has written a romantic novel in which he fantasizes that he has an affair with the Princess of Cardiff, a thinly veiled Priness Diana. I read a few quotes from "The Princess and the President" and all I can say is, "Gag me, yuk!" It will probably sell because of his prestigious past and the female subject matter, but it really sounds cornball sop and sentiment.


Now I don't mind a Dirty Old Man---since I'm one myself---fantasizing about a gorgeous princess in moments of erotica, but let's not get carried away, Valery. I'd rather remember you as the worldly and dignified President of France and an able diplomat---not as a hack writer of romantic drivel. Just keep your fantasies private.

Monday, September 21, 2009

BE NICE----PLEASE

I was delighted to see that the President of the United States, in his interviews with the major TV networks on Sunday past, emphasized having civil debate instead of the "rude" (his word) rantings we hear today.

The far right has every right to dissent and disagree, as do all Americans of whatever political persuasions. But why can't honest differences be debated in a rational and civil way? I often say that my age is showing, but one of the major changes I have seen in my long life is the loss of good old-fashioned, just plain civility. Is it really that hard to air differences in a civil way?

O.K., you don't have to love each other, which is hypocritical, but you can certainly exchange your views so that you can hear each other. I am shocked at the total rudeness of so many conflicting opiners who immediately square off in a verbal boxing stance. They're too busy screaming---and never hear the other side! They are too busy listening to their own rantings.
All that is accomplished is a further inflexibility in thinking and locking out honest dissent.

Does it make you a sissy or a wimp to listen to each other? Come on, America, demonstrate a new old idea---"Democracy in Action"---the right to debate, disagree but ultimately work things out.

Saturday, September 19, 2009

SPORTS AND THE DOLLAR

The recent flap in the tennis world about Serena Williams at the U.S. Open and her barrage of "F-bombs", as the British press dubbed them, is getting ridiculous and hypocritical. In almost every sport in the world, athletes have bad moments and ""lose it". Tiger Woods recently threw his club and frequently curses; N.B.A. players trash each other with obscenities on a regular basis; baseball teams are involved in mass fights; British football (soccer) players tramp, kick or gouge each other, as do N.F.L. players, etc., etc.

O.K., give Serena a stiffer fine if that bobs your cork, but with her money, that becomes symbolic. Or ban her from a few matches, which is meaningless as she really only cares about majors. But the recent posturing of some tennis officials to ban her from tennis is an empty threat and stupid.

What really concerns me much more is the power of the dollar and commercialism on the length of championship sporting events. Remember the famous "Heidi" incident some years ago when a key N.F.L. game at the most crucial moment was replaced on the air by the prescheduled program of the children's classic? Or, in the case of the U.S. Tennis Open, because of "time considerations" (translate that, money), any five set match must be settled by a tiebreaker. That is ridiculous. Can you imagine the classic confrontations of Federer and Nadal and Federer and Roddick in Wimbledon finals being shortened for commercial considerations? You let first-class athletes fight it out to the end in such situations. It should be part of the contract between the network and the sponsor that all championship matches should be allowed, in the case of five setters, to reach their natural, not a forced, conclusion. The sponsors want their products shown to a mass audience, like the U.S. Open, so do you really think they would refuse to sponsor an event if this rule were in effect?

The networks need to show some guts. The public would back them up.

Wednesday, September 16, 2009

NOT A BAD IDEA

Reading an article in the papers today, I note in Britain the government is about to impose a fine of 1000 pounds (about $1600.00) on motorists who do not insure their cars, even if the cars are locked in a garage or off-road.

In U.K. you must have a badge on your windscreen (windshield to you and me), annually renewable, to show that your car has passed the MOT (Ministry of Transportation) test. Each year you must take your car to a MOT-approved garage where the car is tested for driveability and must pass certain minimum safety requirements before the badge of acceptance is issued.

Some states in the U.S. do this, but I think there is something to be said for a national requirement like the MOT. I can hear the ultra-right starting to scream already, "Oh, my God, here comes more socialism, more government poking noses into our private liberties!"

But think a bit more: wouldn't a test that would get clunkers off the road and ensure that drivers have insurance be worthwhile? Isn't one of the major expenses of auto insurance the built-in cost of compensating for the cost of accidents with uninsured motorists? We could possibly reduce the cost of insurance and reduce accidents.

Sure, you wouldn't get the service for free, but I bet, insurancewise, we would be money ahead.

Just another thought from your "socialistic" big brother!

Monday, September 14, 2009

IN DEFENCE OF SCOTLAND

Periodically, as Americans become enraged at national and international political events, we overreact to these events and do some silly things. Remember, when we were pissed off at the French---I mean really pissed off, because we're frequently mad at the contrary French---how we were going to call French Fries "Freedom" Fries?

Now it's Scotlands's turn. We have every reason to be incensed by the shabby Lockerbie affair in which England is deeply involved (or perhaps buried would be an apter choice of words). The Scots have in their laws a "compassionate" clause as well as no death penalty, so legally they were within their rights to free the bomber. But that does not excuse their bad judgment. They could have put him in a prison hospital in Scotland for his remaining time instead of sending him back to Libya, and nobody would have said a word. But we all know how oil and money and secret governmental deals created that shambles.

But let's say a few good words for the Scots. I admit a prejudice: my wife's maiden name was Scott, with English mother and Scottish father from near Glasgow (who spents most of his life in England). Also, on my mother's side, there's a lot of Scottish blood. In fact, her maiden surname, which is my first name, was Alexander.

Now that I've added this forewarning of my prejudices, let me say I have been to Scotland and know quite a few Scots, and they are usually wonderful people. As with any ethnic group, there are always a fair share of horsesasses, but, on the whole, they are generous---not tight as they are portrayed, just "careful" with their money---humorous and loving folk. Believe me, you would invite them home for dinner.

Now I note that Scottish products are suffering from the Lockerbie backlash. Walker's Shortbread, one of the world's fine cookies (or biscuits, as the Brits call them) and a popular seller in the U.S., is deeply concerned that sales are in danger of falling badly. Harris Tweed, one of the venerable great names in fabrics, is de-emphasizing the Scottish connotations and emphasizing its Hebrides Island heritage.

Well, I want to draw the line right here. If you think I am going to give up my favorite drink, Scotch whisky, you are out of your skull. For some things, a man has to make his stand. Any nation that can create a drink as good as Scotch has to have redeeming qualities.

So, let's not get carried away, America. This too shall pass...

Monday, September 7, 2009

IS THIS MY COUNTRY?

What the hell is going on in America since I left in late June? The Republican Party, who is currently making me ashamed that I ever associated myself with the G.O.P., has turned into a bunch of whiners and screamers, sniveling away at their loss of freedom and trampled rights. Now I read they are bitching about the idea of the President of the United States making a televised speech to the school children of America, which, they claim is "Big Brotherhood" with this looming sinister figure of the despot President interfering with their inalienable rights.

Let's get real, G.O.P. ultra-conservatives, what is so evil and criminal about the leader of our country talking to kids, as the President of the United States, about the opportunites education presents to them for their betterment and to contribute to the world? Is that sedition, for God's sake? And, as an Afro-American who worked hard for everything he has accomplished, isn't he uniquely qualified to talk to our kids on this important subject?

One of our major educational concerns in America has been the "dumbing down" of educational standards and the loss of quality in our schools. (The same problems are applicable here in U.K., I might add.) We should be delighted that the President of the United States of America has the interest and the concern to want to encourage the nurturing of education among our future citizens.

I am ashamed to learn that in Lee County where I live in America the major city, Fort Myers, banned the President's speech in schools. I find it humiliatingly ignorant that redneck ignorance prevails.

I also think the times we are in calls for a strong leader who is deeply concerned with the wellbeing of our children as well as the older generations. F.D.R. was hated by the Republicans during the depression when I was a kid, but very few people dispute today---even Republicans--- that his strong leadership was a major factor psychologically in overcoming the depression. Can any rational person question that we need a strong executive today?

Shame on you, ultra right-wingers. Why don't you come out FOR something... instead of always being ANTI something. Try to think about the good for the majority of people, just once. You might even learn to enjoy it.

Sunday, September 6, 2009

WHY AM I NOT SURPRISED?

The Lockerbie shambles brings daily revelations, and the political posturing---and lying---just keeps rolling along, like Old Man River.

Jack Straw, the British Justice Secretary, who is a bit of a weasel, another Teflon politician who gets knocked down and then pops up again, admitted that trade considerations were an essential part of the prisoner transfer deal with Libya. DUH!!! Meanwhile, Gordon Brown, the Prime Minister, tap dances around the subject.

While up north, the M.S.P. (Members of the Scottish Parliament) by a vote of 73-50 rejected the Scottish government's decision to release the bomber. Of course, this is purely symbolic: the horse left the barn last month.

I commented in a blog a couple of weeks ago that oil and business make odd bedfellows when governmental interests are involved. You know very well that George W. and Dick Cheney were most aware of this fact in Iraq, so Britain is not the only guilty party to this type of hypocrisy.

The "special relationship" between U.K. and U.S.A. is severely stressed by this Lockerbie mess; however, I believe common interests will prevail and the principals will ride out the storm.

Sometimes I feel like Diogenes of ancient Greece, who went around with a lamp, looking for an honest man. Or politician, to be more specific...

Tuesday, September 1, 2009

LET'S MAKE A DEAL.

The latest reassessment of the war in Afghanistan by the new commander, General Stanley McChrystal, is cause for sobering thought---if no real surprises. It has been apparent for some time that we are fighting a war with one hand tied behind our back with an elusive enemy that ducks back into a safe zone in Pakistan when the heat gets extreme and patiently waits its turn to strike back. Escalation of number of troops will be the next step. And the beat goes on…

I think General McChrystal is right in trying to limit civilian casualties and in seeking to “democratize” the people, but who are we kidding: so long as war lords hold sway and money is coined from the opium trade, we are always going to be limited in our success.

Several analysts here in Britain---and now add the name of the Foreign Secretary David Miliband---are pushing for trying to win over some of the local chieftains and war lords to cause a split in the Taliban’s efforts. This pragmatic approach of making deals with the local boys to create splits in the Taliban makes sense; it’s the old cliché: if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em. Personally, I would enjoy seeing the Taliban fight among themselves. It’s worth checking out.

Wednesday, August 26, 2009

THE DEATH OF A LION

If you had asked me forty, even thirty, years ago, I never thought I would be writing a eulogy for Teddy Kennedy whose death at 77 marks the end of an incredible span of almost half a century---47 years, to be precise---in the U.S. Senate.

No one was quicker than I to condemn his actions at Chappaquiddick and the resulting tragic death of Mary Jo Kopechne by drowning. I also remember his tempestuous marriage to Joan Kennedy in what seemed to be an eternal gossip page scandal of drinking and debauchery. In fact, I wrote a blog back in March against his being knighted by Queen Elizabeth II.

I did not always agree with him politically, but you cannot dispute his steadfast devotion to the causes of the underprivileged and, in particular, his efforts for the cause of Civil Rights. He was a consistent champion of the poor and neglected and represented a powerful voice for the conscience of America.

He is an example of the true meaning of the word "redemption"---a man who turned his life around, overcame his stormy past and became a powerful and effective political voice.

The lion of the Senate is gone and he will be missed. Requiescat in pace.





T

Sunday, August 23, 2009

FLIPPING BIRDS

The latest international hornets nest is the return of the convicted Lockerbie terrorist, Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al Megrabi, to Libya, having been freed by Scotland for “compassionate” reasons. I find it interesting that compassion applies to a convicted murderer but not to the families who lost 270 dear ones in that horrific bombing at Lockerbie, Scotland in 1988.

A conspiracy theory is floating around in the papers and on the tube which has it that a deal was made to protect U.K. oil interests in Libya where British Petroleum (B.P.) has a huge investment and other British business interests. The British government has denied this vigorously. Lord Mandelson, the Business Secretary (the equivalent of the Secretary of Commerce in the U.S.A.), in the absence of the Prime Minister., Gordon Brown, who is on holiday and has been extremely mute, put out a strong denial that a deal had been made. I wonder: oil makes a lot of unlikely bedfellows, as does the profit motive.

Several British governmental voices have been quick to condemn the tasteless celebrations in Libya that greeted the arrival of the terrorist who was hailed as a hero. Obviously, America has made its feelings known to both Libya and Scotland.

Personally, I think we have a case of dual bird flippings (or two fingers up in U.K.). I think both Libya and Scotland just love the opportunity to demonstrate how they can stand up to the big bad U.S.A. and assert their symbolic independence. No one is going to tell them what to do, by God! We run our own countries, and we’ll do it, as Frank Sinatra said, our way!

In the case of Libya, they love to posture in front of the Arab world against these western infidels. As for Scotland, I love the Scots, but they have that same stubborn streak as those other Celts, the Irish, and they are pushing hard for devolution, the separation of Scotland from the U.K as an independent nation, so they want to express their own opinion, even when it’s wrong.

It was a bad decision which they are trying to justify by claiming that this is true compassion. Their own M.S.P. (Members of the Scottish Parliament) are planning a discussion and some are pressing for a debate. That should be interesting…

Sometimes it’s a hasty and ill-advised move to flip a bird.

Tuesday, August 18, 2009

THE BABY AND THE BATH WATER

On both sides of the Atlantic critics of our economic woes have been numerous and vocal---with good cause, I agree. The world economy is in bad shape, and the fix ain't easy.

A think tank on the left here in England named Compass is suggesting that part of the answer is to form a "high pay commission" which would oversee salaries and bonuses in the City (the Brit equivalent of Wall Street) to determine if they are excessive and add to the decline of economic stability. At first reading, this idea sounds plausible; after all, the greedy bastards are overpaid, exacerbate the economic problems and should be under supervision. In our current mood it is easy to say, "String 'em up!"

But reconsider this idea. Do you really want another bureaucratic layer of "commissioners" acting as judge and jury of what is excessive pay? Do we want to take the chance of penalizing true entreprenurial spirit and innovative thinking that brings about growth and development of new ideas and new products? If executives create companies, make saleable products which are profitable, they deserve to be rewarded.

It is not fair to make the bankers, insurance companies and investment firms the sole villians for vilification. Let's face it: the cult of greed was sowed starting in the Reagan eighties, fertilized by the laissez faire attitudes of the Clinton years and harvested by the "anything goes" attitude of W. and his buddies. Long-term planning, just plain looking ahead to see where to go in the future, was sacrificed for short-term gains and a "feel-good" boom economy. The ruling economic principle was carpe diem---enjoy it while you've got it, take the money and run!

We don't need a new commission. Capitalism and the free market can still work, so long as we have some moral good sense to go with them, and guiding principles that say products should benefit consumers and users, be sold at reasonable profits and the entrepreneurs/executives should be rewarded for success only. We have enough watch dogs and built-in safeguards, if exercised, to control greed.

So don't throw the proverbial baby out with the bath water. Just return to some of those old-fashioned values and virtues, corny things like hard work, thriftiness, planning and, most of all, ethics...I think if you exercise your memory, you can remember those old values.

Friday, August 14, 2009

THAT BOGEYMAN IS HERE AGAIN!

The Republicans are at it again, raising the spectre of that old nemesis---dare I use the dirty word?---SOCIALIZED MEDICINE!!! Now they are flinging indiscriminate barbs at the National Health Service in U.K., hereafter referred to as the N.H.S. They are using all the tired old arguments I've been hearing since the fifties about the failures of the N.H.S.: the long waiting time to see a doctor, the inferior quality of medical treatments, inavailability of specialists, etc., etc---same old, same old. This strategy of dumping on the N.H.S. is to convince the public that the attempts by President Obama to reform and extend heath care to the 40+ millon who don't have it will lead to a monolithic super-government supervised by a Death Squad which will plummet us to chaos and ruin. Does the fact that America, the leading industrial nation in the world and powerhouse of the G-20 is the ONLY major nation that does not have a national health plan count for anything? Tell that to the 40+ million.

The N.H.S. here in U.K., like the Empire, strikes back. Published in "The Daily Telegraph" were a list of allegations the right wing had claimed about the N.H.S. and the N.H.S. response.

For example, the conservatives claim that people over 59 can't receive heart repairs, stents or bypasses. Fact: a national audit on cardiac surgery demonstrated that 20% of all cardiac patients were 75 or over.

Claim: Women under 25 are not allowed to be screened for cervical cancer. Fact: Women in Scotland, Wales and Northern Island (all part of United Kingdom) get regular screenings; in England, under 25 can be screened if deemed clinically needed.

Claim: Ted Kennedy at 77 would be too old to be treated for his brain tumor in England. Fact:
Health service is provided on the basis of clinical need, regardless of age, according to a Department of Health spokesman.

Claim: 4 in 10 cancer patients under N.H.S. don't have access to an oncologist. Fact: Macmillian Cancer Support states those figures are 15 years old and that the number of cancer specialists has risen by 59.7% since 1997.

You know the old adage that you can skew numbers (and facts) to suit your purposes, and, to my mind, that's what the right wing is doing. The N.H.S. isn't perfect, like most bureaucracies, but if there are critical life decisions to be acted upon, they come through.

The Nobel Physicist Stephen Hawking was in Washington to receive the Presidential Medal of Freedom, our highest civilian honor. He is wheelchair-bound and has suffered for years from Lou Gehrig's disease---but he said in an interview in Washington that he would not be alive without the N.H.S.

Q.E.D.









Monday, August 10, 2009

A REAL WAKE-UP CALL

I read a very interesting article in "The Daily Telegraph" this past weekend regarding the phenomenal growth of Muslim immigration in the European Union countries, including the U.K., where, it is predicted, the Muslim population of the E.U. will be 20% by the year 2050---a startling growth from the current 5% in 2008. The current leaders in Muslim population in Europe are: (1) France at 9%, (2) Holland at 5.2%, (3) Sweden at 5%, (4) Austria at 4.8% and (5) Germany at 4.3%. The rest of Europe vary from 3.7% down to 1.7%.

I also saw on the internet a couple of months ago a video regarding the birth rates among the “white” populations as contrasted to Hispanics, Africans, Asian Indians, Chinese and other races which demonstrated that the birth rate among Caucasian nations was falling dramatically or, at the best, stagnant while the other races, excluding the Chinese who have had a strict population control program in effect for some years, are surging upwards.

We know, for example, in the United States the birth rate of Hispanics has shown sizeable increases with the result that California, the most populous state, has reached the point where the “minority” races outnumber the whites.

I am quoting these statistics not as a white racist but as a realist who thinks it is high time that America and Europe begin to make a priority of how best to integrate these growing minorities into our national life. Restrictive immigration policies are too late: Pandora is already out of the box. Historically, America has always relied on the “melting pot” theory where immigrants over many years slowly but surely become part of the mainstream of population. It has not always been easy, and many ethnic groups have suffered through humiliation and prejudice before acceptance; witness, the Jews, the Irish and the Italians, not to mention Afro-Americans who are still undergoing this process.

Now we have a new dilemma in the influx of Muslims in America and, particularly, in Europe. The major problems with certain ethnic groups in the past has been the language barrier with the need of the immigrants to learn the home language in order to become part of the country. Now, with the Muslims, we also face, in addition to the language problem, the religion difference. All countries with immigrants have historically had other world religions introduced into their cultures, but, unfortunately, within the Muslim world, there exists a lunatic fringe of extremists, under the guise of true believers, who declare the West, especially America and Britain, their mortal enemies to be fought and destroyed. I am not taking a broad brush and smearing all Muslims as extremists, for I am confident that the vast majority are people of true faith and good will seeking a peaceful and prosperous living when they emigrate.

What needs to be done by both America and Europe is to face up to this new problem and develop a policy of integrating these new arrivals in our respective countries. Make mandatory courses in learning the home language to accelerate the process of integration into the society. If you can’t speak or understand the language spoken in your country of choice, how can you possibly prosper and find economic opportunity? You are automatically relegated to the lower economic strata, it goes without saying. When you have improved your lot in life and are economically more secure, you are obviously less inclined to radical activities against that country.

You also need to stimulate the aspirations for growth by the integration process where you encourage breaking out of the nationalistic ghettos, those tight little islands set up in most major cities where new immigrants live only with other immigrants of the same or similar backgrounds. In these economic times, that is hard to accomplish, but some kind of economic stimuli packages must be developed for the purpose of encouraging the development of independence and striking out in new directions. For example, here in the U.S.A. in the reformation and rebuilding of out infrastructure, could some of these new workers be used as laborers and trained in new professions and be taught English at night. European countries could develop similar programs, as well.

You also need to practice more selective screening of immigrants to ensure their true desire for a better life. I know there is no foolproof means test to make such a determination, but closer scrutiny is necessary so that constructive and truly eager people, really seeking new lives and opportunities, would be the norm for acceptance as immigrants and not the "free ride" seekers.

Let me end with a quotation from Jerome Vignon, the director for employment and social affairs at the European Commission: “…social integration of migrants should be given as much importance as monitoring the inflow of migrants.” These are the facts, people---I think we better deal with them now or we may be planting the seeds for future discord and turmoil.

Tuesday, August 4, 2009

MORE FROM ALICE IN WONDERLAND

Oh, Lord, here we go again! The P.C. Patrol strikes again!

A furniture store owner in downtown Eastbourne, East Sussex, England, where my wife and I spend our summers, had a bunch of foreign students come into his store, plop down on his floor sample chairs and even lie down on his beds---all the while eating fast food and consuming soft drinks and spilling the food and drink on the chairs, beds and floor. This is not the first time this has happened, and he was really pissed off, with some cause, I might add. He posted two signs: (1) no food or drink allowed in the store (and (2) foreign students not welcome.

The second notice was his big mistake. He has been advised that he may be in violation of human rights and racial equality laws and could be liable for legal action. He probably would have been wiser just to post the first notice and leave it at that, but I'm sure he wa smarting from these inappropriate and expensive (to the store owner) actions of the foreign students.

Then there was an inteview on the local news with several foreign students, all of whom blandly state that they bring food into stores all the time. One even brazenly said, "After all, I have to have some place to eat my lunch."

It is so typical of the time we live in where lack of civility and just plain non-thinking are the rule of the day. Then add to this mixture the cult of Political Correctness to turn a bad situation even sourer with the misapplication of human rights laws.

I did a lot of dumb things as a kid, but eating my lunch in a store and spilling food all over the place was one action I never considered. Am I wrong in thinking the store owner has a few rights, too? I guess my age is showing.

Sunday, July 26, 2009

HERE COMES THE P.C. CONTROL!

In this age of Political Correctness I am frequently astonished by new examples of P.C. I thought America was the world leader in P.C., but my time in England in the summer these last few years has convinced me that the U.K. is a serious rival to the U.S.A. in this department.

Then, this Sunday morning on the telly, as our British friends refer to T.V., I saw an astonishing new example of P.C.. A morning talk show had expert guests discussing whether Great Apes should be subject to Human Rights. One professor argued that great apes show evidence of enough intelligence that they should be subject to human rights, while another professorial expert argued that the evidence of such intelligence was specious and that these apes do not possess enough intelligence to be considered eligible for human rights. A whole group of experts played intellectual ping-pong with this subject of rights for apes.

I find all this debate a bit of Alice in Wonderland. We’re talking about apes, for God’s sake. Now before the A.C.L.U. and assorted tree hugger mentalities condemn me as a crass and insensitive lout, I want to assure them that I certainly do not condone mistreatment of these magnificent creatures or the wanton destruction of these animals or the unnecessary capture and sale of them. But human rights? Let’s get real.

Now, if you want to talk about the extension of human rights to the dispossessed and downtrodden of the third world or the victims and refugees of war-torn regions of the world---then you’ve got my attention. Let’s do something about that and stop this ridiculous P.C. Patrol investigating this nonsense of human rights for great apes. Enough, already…

Thursday, July 16, 2009

WHERE HAVE ALL THE HEROES GONE...

I was contemplating today writing a blog about the attrition through age of "the greatest generation", as Tom Brokaw so aptly called the generation that fought WW II, when I read my old friend Grumpy's blog (grumpy-olddog.blogspot.com---well worth reading, as I've said before) about the death of another hero of that war and wisely saying that such a hero is what the Staples Center should be packed for---Amen. Grumpy beat me to it, but I still want to put my two cents in.

One of my pleasures in England is reading the obituaries in "The Daily Telegraph" or "The Times"where crafting these tributes to the dead is a real art form. The "New York Times" sometimes can rival the British papers in this department--but not often. Several times a week, you can be certain, a key obituary in the British papers will concern another war hero who has passed on, and by this time such heroes are becoming fewer and fewer. My older brother's death in late June (see my blog of July 9, 2009) was another example of another loss by that great brotherhood of WW II.

We should stop and remember them, as they become rarer and rarer. We owe them an incalcuable debt, for they paid a great price to guarantee us the liberty we possess today. It is so easy for us to be caught up in the daily problems of life, especially in the economic conditions of today, that we forget to consider how much worse conditions would be if we had lost that war and were yoked in the bondage of Fascism. The same respect should be tendered, it goes without saying, to those who fought in Korea or Nam or in today's storm centers of Iraq and Afghanistan.

Every day, even when the world is too much with you, pause and think of those heroes and what they did---for you and me.

Thursday, July 9, 2009

MY BROTHER HENRY: A REMEMBRANCE

I have not written a blog recently for reasons that will be apparent. I am writing this now from my wife's and my summer home in England.

I lost my older and only surviving brother on June 29, 2009, who died without excessive pain and with admirable dignity in a hospital hospice. Henry, or Hank to most of his friends, had a long and tempestuous life and would have been eighty-eight in August, so he certainly had, as the Brits would say, very good innings. He had been married three times. Both his divorced wives preceded him in death, but his third, to whom he was married for almost thirty-seven years, survives. He died surrounded by loved ones: his caring wife, who demonstrated in his last weeks of swift and painful decline extraordinary dimensions of care and love; his sister; his only surviving daughter; two of his three surviving sons---the third was out of the country---and two step-daughters.

I was not there when he actually died because my wife and I were leaving for our summer home in England the very day he died, but I had spent three days with him the previous week in the hospital starting the day after he was admitted and was, aside from his wife, blessed to see him in his most rational although often painful state. I thank God I had this opportunity. I had originally thought I would run up to see him in his home in Minneapolis after I returned from England in late September, but his decline in health was so precipitous that I decided the only course of action was to go immediately before our trip. We had just arrived on the Monday from our home in Florida to visit our daughter and son who have families in Toledo, and I flew to Minneapolis on the Wednesday. Since I had not seen him for almost two years, it was one of the wisest decisions I ever made.

His decline had begun five years before when he had a severe stroke, but he had recovered from that onslaught and reached about ninety percent recovery, thanks to a strong will, superb medical care including a persistent and gifted therapist and the attentive care of his wife. In the last year his decline gained momentum and picked up speed in the last few months. His wife had put him temporarily in a nursing home for nine days while she visited two children from a previous marriage and a granddaughter whom she had not seen for some time. When she returned, she found him going downhill fast and within two days she had him admitted to the hospital---the same one where he was treated for his stroke. He was there less than a week.

Hank had led a full and tempestuous life. I described in an earlier blog (June 6, 2009) his valorous experience as a Navigator on a B-24 Liberator 4-engine bomber, having flown thirty-six missions and having been shot down on his thirteenth mission on Friday, the thirteenth.

Both his previous wives preceded him in death, while he was survived by his last wife to whom he was happily married for almost thirty-seven years. He went through his first two marriages, fathering two sons by his first wife and four children---two girls and two boys---by his second. Through his last two marriages he was also step-father to three women.

He spent a good portion of his first two marriages as an alcoholic, graduating from heavy drinking (which many servicemen who had been exposed to combat used as "surcease from sorrow") to a full-blown boozer with a life spinning out of control. and going through a dark night of the soul. Then in 1971 he totally changed his life by joining Alcoholics Anonymous. He also married his surviving wife in 1972, a woman who had lived through a previous marriage to an alcoholic and understood the problems and who by profession was a Probation Officer for the state of Minnesota.

A.A. became the centerpiece of his life. He regularly attended meetings, at least twice a week, and became a potent counsellor to those seeking to break the vise of alcoholism. He had an articulate and confrontational style---you could not con him, for he knew all the tricks in the book---in dealing with those seeking his help. One of the more moving experiences of my last visits with him was seeing the number of recovering A.A.s who came to see him and thank him for what a difference he had made in their lives.

He lived life to the lees. He loved jazz and was a drummer. An ardent sportsman, his joy was in hunting and fishing in the Dakotas, Minnesota or Canada. At one time I used to join him and a group of his riotously funny A.A. buddies in fishing for walleyed pike, perch and bass at Lake of the Woods in northern Ontario. He and his wife Anice traveled extensively in Europe and Africa and all over the U.S., particularly to California where her daughters and granddaughter lived. They used to winter in Florida near his oldest son in Fort Myers and near us in Sanibel Island. They were deeply involved in the cultural life of the Twin Cities---from sports to art.

So that is the brother I have lost. We went through good times; we went through bad; and then it was good again. He could infuriate me, he could amuse me, but always he could not be ignored. His children endured some bad patches in their relationships with him, but in the end love prevailed and carried the day.

At his memorial service two days after he died, which I unfortunately had to miss due to my flight to England, one hundred fifty people attended, plus the family. He had asked for a jazz band at the gathering after the service. I bet he was up there, smiling and playing drums.

My brother: warm, opinionated, funny, irritating, quixotic, unpredictable---but always interesting and lively. He’s gone, and I miss him. And I love him. I know I’ll see him in the next few years, and we’ll pick up where we left off. Until then, to use his favorite phrase, I’ll try to keep everything under control.

Friday, June 19, 2009

GIVE ME LIBERTY...I HOPE

As it frequently happens when an oppressive regime has been in power too long and too rigidly, the young and the dispossessed rise up and express their outrage. What we are seeing in Iran is this principle in action. The old regime, with their tight-fisted and inflexible rules, is suddenly faced with the first challenge to their authority. Perhaps the mullahs will act like the Soviets did in the Cold War days and try to crush the dissidents. Or maybe they will loosen up a bit, but I doubt it.

Now Pandora's box is open. The open communications of the Internet and Twitter and Facebook have opened up a new world to the youth in Iran, and they want to be part of this new world. The old regime may try to crush it, but liberty and free thought, once tasted, make a heady brew and cannot be eliminated.

Our president is playing the diplomatic game very well at this point, not wanting to give the old regime the chance to say the "Great Satans" of America are meddling in their affairs. But Barack Obama can quietly stir the pot and keep this spirit of liberty going.

If the Iranians start on a path of independence, perhaps it could be a beneficial domino effect in the Middle East and lead to some serious peace negotiations and mutual respect for each country's sovereignty. "'Tis a consummation devoutly to be wished."

Saturday, June 13, 2009

THE AGE OF UNREASON

What is going on? The killing of the late-term abortion doctor, Dr. Tiller, the shooting of the guard at the Holocaust Museum---these recent extreme acts of a lunatic fringe seem to be mounting. Certainly, the unrest and malaise of our economic times add to the stress and generate action by these crazies. The polarization of competing ideologies adds fuel to the fire. I'm reminded of lines from The Second Coming by William Butler Yeats, my favorite poet of the twentieth century:

"Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity."

Having always been something of a centrist, I do not like the extremes that create this anarchy. I recognize the fact that most major changes in the world, for better of for worse, usually come from the extremes, but ultimately the moderating forces go to work---and make things work.

Let us hope that people of sanity and clarity can keep control, that convictions for what is right and just are more than only "passionate intensity", that reason ultimately prevails.

Sunday, June 7, 2009

WHO SAYS NICE GUYS FINISH LAST?

I believe it was baseball's Leo Durocher, the pugnacious shortstop and later manager (among others) of the Brooklyn Dodgers who coined the phrase, "Nice guys finish last." We now have living proof that it ain't necessarily so---Roger Federer finally won the French Open, for the first time after three previous trips to the finals, thus tying Pete Sampras with fourteen grand slam wins ,the most ever, and, by winning the French, doing something Sampras never achieved. Federer in the final beat in straight sets the Swede, Robin Soderling, the man who had knocked out the Clay Court King, #1 ranked Rafael Nadal, in the third round of the tournament.

So few champions in any sport have shown the grace, charm and good spirit of Roger Federer. The will to win and to focus on an objective are supreme in this great athlete, but, while his competitive fires burn bright, he remains a symbol of true sportsmanship. Hemingway once described courage as "grace under pressure". Roger Federer epitomizes this definition.

At 27 he is probably on the downside of his victory curve, but I would not be surprised if he has another grand slam or two in his future.

Here's to a gracious athlete who can be a living example to all the smart asses who thump their chests and crow about their prowess. Federer lives it but still has time to be a good guy, respected and held in real affection by his peers.

Sorry, Leo, you weren't always right---thank God.

Saturday, June 6, 2009

REMEMBRANCE OF THING PAST: 1944

It is hard to believe it has been sixty-five years since D-Day. I remember I had just returned home to Ohio from my junior year at prep school in Pennsylvania and listening to some of the live reports from war correspondents as that traumatic day enfolded. This anniversary triggers more memories of one of the most vividly dramatic periods of my life, World War II.

My family was deeply involved in the war with my two older brothers both serving in the military. The middle brother. Alfred, I described in my blog of May 25, 2009, was killed in the Phillippines later in January of 1945. My oldest brother, Henry, had gone overseas in the spring of 1944, assigned as a Navigator on a B-24 Liberator in Foggia, Italy in the 15th Air Force of the Army Air Corps. (Remember, in those days, the Air Force was still part of the Army.) He and his crew flew thirty-five missions and, thank God, lived to tell the tale. Their crew had several, to use an old Air Force expression. "hairy" experiences.

The most memorable reads likes an implausible hollywood script for some B movie with Ronald Reagan.

On their 13th mission, on Friday, October 13, 1944 at about 1300 hours, their B-24 was hit by flak while bombing Vienna. A black pilot in a P-47 Thunderbolt, trying to protect them, was also hit. The two planes tried to limp home to their bases in Italy but could not make it, and they all bailed out over the mountainous terrain of what was then Yugoslavia. They all made it safely to the ground. My brother, Hank, just like the Hollywood script would dictate, landed in a haystack! As he gathered himself together, running toward him was a peasant woman with a rifle and cartridge belt slung over her body. Oh shit, thought my brother, I'm in deep trouble. He put up his hands and said, "Americanski". The peasant women smiled and rushed up to embrace him. She was one of the Partisans of Marshall Tito, the Yugoslav patriot who fought against the Nazis.

The Partisans assembles the whole crew of nine plus the P-47 pilot who had tried to protect the B-24 and took them in. They stayed with the Partisans for almost two weeks. At one point, Hank , who had often spent summers on a ranch in Montana and loved to ride, rode out with the Partisans as they reconnoitered for German troops fighting the Partisans in these mountains. Hank laughingly recalls dancing one night with a pretty Partisan girl who also had ammunition belts strung over her shoulders!

The Partisans then hid the whole group in hay wagons and sneaked through the German lines, posing as farmers, and took them to Sofia, Bulgaria where Russian transport planes used to land to refuel on their way to pick up supplies from Allied forces in Italy. The American boys persuaded the Russian pilots to let them hitch a ride---and they all got back to Italy, safe and sound.

Then they flew twenty-two more missions. They were then sent home and were sent for "R&R" in southern California. My brother had a brief leave at home before going to rest camp, and he was obviously suffering from "combat fatigue", as they euphimistically called it in those days, and needed the rest camp. He was offered the opportunity to be a lead squadron Navigator on B-29s in the Pacific, but he respectfully declined, having done more than his share and having accumulated enough combat points to be honorably discharged in June of 1945 as the war was beginning to wind down, the European phase ending in May of 1945 and the Pacific part terminating after the atomic bombs in August 1945.

It was a real war. Those memories don't seem like 65 years ago.

Wednesday, June 3, 2009

YOU WANT EGG ROLL WITH YOUR HUMMER?

You have probably read about GM divesting itself of the Hummer Division, which was sold to a Chinese private manufacturing company, Sichuan Tengzhong Heavy Industrial Machinery who make all kinds of road equipment ranging from bridge piers to highway construction and maintenance machinery as well as recently moving into heavy trucks, like tow trucks and oil tankers.

I find it mind-blowing that a company in a Communist state-controlled economy wants to pick up the symbol of "conspicuous consumption" (as the economist Verblen referrred to showy assets), the very metaphor for capitalist yuppiness, that gas-guzzling-but-who-gives-a-shit behemoth of the road with its 3-5 miles per gallon gas consumption. Maybe they want to create a yuppy class in Red China! They make noises about increasing the fuel efficiency. Does that mean increasing it from 3-5 to 8-10 m.p.g.?

Some wag-blogger on the internet broke me up with the comment to the effect: oh, good, now we can buy our military vehicles from the enemy! I wonder if, instead of armor-plating the underside, they'll probably use tinfoil...

They also say they will continue to make the Hummer here in the U.S.A. They have no choice for now in order to get the product on the market, but do you want to take a bet how long that will last?

Americans are so used to their big wheels that it is going to take a seismic shift in attitudes to adjust to smaller, more fuel-efficient cars. Every time gas prices jump, we say that we've got to change; then, when they drop, we go back to our old "hit the road" ways. G.M. had to get rid of the Hummer and are shopping around to sell Saab and Saturn. Pontiac is a dead issue. (I wonder whatever happened to my ragtop maroon '69 G.T.O. with 450 horsepower---what a bomb!)

I wonder if the new Hummer, in the best Chinese style, will offer options: like two from column A and one from column B.

Saturday, May 30, 2009

MAYBE THERE'S STILL HOPE

Like most old people, I am quick to criticize or carp about the kids today and their apparent lack of moral values, which. unfortunately, their parents and grandparents never did a thorough job of instilling in them. Then I see a ray of sunshine piercing the grey of today when I read in the NY Times about the various prestigious b-schools where business ethics has become one of the more popular courses.

At Wharton/Penn they now have several professors teaching business ethics where formerly they had one. At the Harvard Business School, nearly 20% of the graduating M.B.A. class, about 160, have signed a student-generated pledge of good business ethics "to serve the greater good"and to take social responsibility for their actions. At Columbia Business School. in addition to requiring the ethics course, the students have formed a "Leadership and Ethics Board" and sponsor ethical lectures.

It looks like the shameful histories of Enron. MCI, AIG, Madoff, toxic loans and shady hedge funds have sunk in, and the kids today are hearing the message. I don't know how long the effect will last because greed has a way of insinuating itself into the corporate world, but I am hopeful that this new generation have seen enough---and had enough---to keep that responsible perspective. Let us pray.

Friday, May 29, 2009

HERE WE GO AGAIN---15 NEW ROUNDS!

I have been following the saga of Father Cutie (pronounced KOO'-tee-ay), the Roman Catholic priest known as "Father Oprah" because of his popularity with the Hispanics in the Miami and South Florida area and his radio show on Radio Paz broadcast in South Florida, the Americas and Spain. Handsome and charismatic, he had the pining housewives of South Florida sighing and gushing over him. Then the bombshell exploded: photos of Father Cutie, dallying on the beach in somewhat intimate and amorous poses with a very attractive young woman were published, and the you-know-what hit the fan.

He was interviewed on one of the morning shows (without his clerical collar) and asked some probing questions by the woman host, which, to his credit, he handled in a forthright manner. He admitted to being in love and having had a relationship with the young woman the last two years and that he had known her and been friends for several years. He professes that this relationship was the first rupture of his vow of celibacy. He said that he had been in consultation with various clerics including his Archbishop regarding his tension and conflict between his clerical vows and his overpowering passionate love for this woman.

Then I read today that he has left the Roman Catholics and joined the Anglo-Catholics, known as the Episcopal Church of America, where he and girl friend, Ruhama Buni Cavellis, a thirty-five year old divorcee, were photographed with the Bishop of South Florida and other clerics in a smiling portrait. He will not be allowed to serve as a priest in the Episcopal Church until he has spent some time in the church and fulfilled "certain requirements". But, guess who is delivering the sermon this Sunday in Trinity Episcopal Church in Miami? You got it---the forty-year-old Mr. Handsome himself. I'll bet the church will be overflowing.

I also see that his former Catholic Archbishop, the Very Rev. John Favarola, was shocked by the decision and claims that the former Father Cutie had said zilch to him about leaving the church when he met with Father Oprah in early May and that he had not had any word from his counterpart, the Episcopal Bishop of South Florida, which he found disturbing for ecumenical relations.

As an Episcopalian myself, I have to chuckle. I love my church, but I have to comment they are gifted with an ardent love of controversy, a gift for shooting themselves in the foot, and generally stirring up the pot. This is the same Episcopal Church that a few years ago at General Convention elected a gay priest in New Hampshire as a Bishop, thereby throwing the Anglican Communion, the international association of Anglican churches, including the Episcopals in the U.S., the Church of England, and Anglican churches in Africa and other parts of the world into a state of chaotic agitation. The African churches of the Anglican Communion, which number about 33,000,000 were ready to kick the Episcopal Church of America, which number about 2,000,000, out of the Communion. It also created a rift in the American Episcopal Church, pitting conservatives against liberals and causing certain really conservative churches and even a couple of dioceses to split off and join CANA (the Convocation of Anglicans in North America), fostered by the Anglican church of Nigeria who even appointed a Bishop to run C.A.N.A. in the U.S.

Personally, to my mind, this controversy of appointing a gay bishop is history, since elected, a fact of life and to be accepted, but I know plenty of Episcopalians who resent that decision, plus it is still a thorn in the side of the Archbishop of Canterbury, the titular head of the Anglican Communion, who is constantly trying to maintain the unity of the Communion, being the peacemaker between the Africans and the Americans,

The point is the Episcopal Church is frequently a storm center of its own devices and loves it! I do hope the Anglo-Catholics and the Roman Catholics will still speak to each other! I'm sure there will be more to comment on in the near future. Stay tuned. Welcome to the club, Father Oprah! You'll fit right in and be a main attraction for some time---a real contender in our ring!

Monday, May 25, 2009

IN MEMORIAM---FOR ALFRED

Today is a very special day in my life, as it is for so many who have lived through world wars, police actions and wars on terror. All of us should bow our heads in prayer, remembering those who died for us.

In my case, I always remember my brother, Alfred, who was killed in World War II. He was the middle brother, I being the youngest who just missed out on that war, with the eldest, Henry, also in combat as a Navigator in the 15th Air Force in Italy where he flew 35 missions. Alfred was a T/5, the equivalent of a Corporal, in an L.S.T., the amphibian landing crafts that convert into tanks once they come out of the water , and was in on the invasion of the island of Leyte in the Phillippines in November 1944. Alfred had been part of the A.S.T.P. (Army Specialized Training Program) where he had been sent to college by the Army with the ultimate aim of becoming an officer and by a quirk of fate was assigned to the University of Cincinnati, much to my mother's delight since she lived in Hyde Park, a suburb of Cincinnati. Unfortunately, this idyll was short-lived, less than a year, because the Army needed more troops for the impending Pacific invasions, and in the spring of 1944 Alfred was assigned to L.S.T. training at Fort Ord on the Monterey Peninsula of California.

Alfred got home for a final furlough in July of 1944. He and I had gone to prep school together at The Hill School in Pottstown PA where Alfred graduated two years before me. When I saw him on this last furlough, I was taller than he for the first time---one of those silly memories you keep in that storehouse called your brain. I also felt more adult and less the kid brother on this occasion.

He went back to California, then to Hawaii before embarking on the big show in the Phillippines. While battling in Leyte, he contracted jungle rot on his arm, a fungus infection that temporarily put him in the hospital. He missed the battle of Ormac on Leyte, one of the last key engagements there but was anxious, as are all soldiers, to get back to his outfit and his buddies. He returned to his company on January 8, 1945 and was assigned to guard duty in a bivouac area. The battle was over, but there were remnants of Japanese soldiers holed up in the hills. One such group had a mortar and fired one shell---and it got Alfred. There is an old military cliche to the effect that you worry less about the bullet with your name on it than the one which says "To Whom It May Concern", and, ironically, that's how he died. He had turned twenty-one the previous November. Alfred was ultimately buried in the military cemetery outside Manila. The family thought it fit and proper that he should be with his fallen comrades, plus what was to be gained by reliving the pain of his death again with a funeral at home.

My father had planned to go to Manila and see his grave in 1969, but ill health prevented the trip. I had occasion to be in Asia on business in Taiwan and Hong Kong in 1977 and decided that I would make the pilgrimage to the Phillippines to see Alfred's grave. I flew into Manila on a Sunday evening, at that time under martial law with soldiers roaming the streets with rifles and machine guns strapped to their backs and imposing a nightly curfew as they were dealing with Communist insurgents. The next day I hired a cab to the cemetery. As you are probably aware, all U.S. military cemeteries are American property in the foreign country and maintained and paid for by the U.S.A.

I went to the guardhouse where I was shown the records containing the names and grave numbers and quickly located Alfred's grave. I thought after thirty-two years I could handle this moment emotionally, but, when I found his grave, I knelt to pray and totally broke down in tears. I took some pictures. I flew out that same day.

I thank God that I made that trip.

That is why Memorial Day is special to me---and to many others. Lest we forget...

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

KEEPING THE PECKER UP---SO TO SPEAK

I want to keep you abreast, as promised in my blog of May 6, 2009, regarding our new neighbors, the pileated woodpeckers, who took over a dead palm tree next to our house and have built "apartments". I haven't seen Dad recently, but Mom is very much in evidence, constantly peering from one of her windows to see what's happening in the neighborhood. We started putting out bread crumbs on a railing on our front porch near her apartment, and they are disappearing regularly. in fact, I think she quite accepts us now, for when I go out on the front porch and descend the steps, if she is perched on the side of the palm, she simply glances at me and then goes about her business. It's nice being accepted by the new neighbors...

I haven't seen any chicks, so I don't know what the plan is. Maybe just get the place ready and populate it later. With that, I'll leave you with an old British expression of good will---nothing else intended---just keep your pecker up!

Monday, May 18, 2009

THE PLAGUE OF PLAGIARISM

I read on the net today that columnist Maureen Dowd of The New York Times is accused of plagiarism or lack of attribution in using someone else's quotation. It seems in one of her columns regarding Dick Cheney and torture she quoted almost literally from another journalist and failed to note it. This is so easy to do in this Age of Information where we are saturated with a blizzard of information and sources. It must be exceedingly difficult to remember what and where you read something you like, as you mentally file it away, with the result that you may forget where it came from and thereby fail to make proper attribution.

I read Maureen Dowd and find her a perceptive columnist, although she does have a tendency to beat the proverbial dead horse to death, especially on the subject of W. and his cronies, especially Dick Cheney. which must drive the neo-cons to drink. I read a few blogs today on this act of plagiarism (or lack of attribution, take your pick) from neo-cons and they were having a field day. citing the liberal conspiracy to besmudge W. and Cheney, those great patriots, and swiping at the Obama crew who are giving the country away. The extremes of both sides. I'm sure, are having a field day.

Some years ago, a very capable History Professor had become President of my alma mater, Hamilton College, for a number of years and done an excellent job of guiding the college when they were going through the transition from a male college to co-educational by absorbing Kirkland College into Hamilton, plus phasing out the old fraternity system, which created a long and divisive struggle among the alumni, including my old fraternity which held out for years in futile resistance before finally acceding. This President resigned under pressure when he was accused of making a speech and failing to attribute some of his remarks. I think there was a bit of academician infighting going on within the faculty and someone was out to get the Pres, I've been told (although I've never heard it substantiated). The charges cost a college president his job.

Stealing ideas and parceling them out as your own is one thing---that is serious and dead wrong and should be publicized and punished, if provable. I strongly suspect, however, that this accusation can be overdone, especially for the reason I list above: that the plethora of information accrued today can confuse and confound anyone.

I think Maureen Dowd is a responsible journalist, strong-minded, witty, ascerbic and liberal. She will have her share of enemies on the right out to get her, but I think her integrity will prevail in this dispute; she's too savvy to have intentionally plagiarized. If I wrote as many columns as she, I'd probably have some critics snapping at my heels, too!

Monday, May 11, 2009

TIGER, TIGER, BURNING BRIGHT---AND SOON!

Sports writers are a unique and opportunistic bunch, sometimes with a penchant to create news and not just report it. When you get down to it, this quality isn't unique to sports writers but many other journalists, as well, but sports writers have a special gift for it.

Witness the Players Championship at Sawgrass, Ponte Vedra, Florida which ended yesterday with a cool and imperturbable Swede named Henrik Stenson demolishing the field. And, to read the sport pages, you would think Tiger Woods choked, fell apart and is in trouble. Agreed, he was not the usual Tiger with that lethal streak which sees him at his best the last day. But, sports guys and gals, let's get real: he was off the competitive circuit for nine months after his reconstructive knee surgery and is still reestablishing his game. He says the knee is fine, but I would think that some physiological adjustments or alterations occurred in view of the gravity of such surgery and Tiger is still adapting to it. I predict in the next month or so, he will get his act together and win the U.S. Open or the Brit version, called internationally The Open, not the British Open.

Plus consider another fact: Tiger has raised the bar of excellence, and there are a bevy of young talented top guns anxious to take on the master. How often have you seen that scenario played out in sports of the old champion inspiring a host of new challengers?

An athlete like Tiger--or Jack Nicklaus or Ben Hogan----doesn't come along every five years; it's more of a generational thing, every twenty or twenty-five. And even the champions lose. Do you remember how often Jack Nicklaus finished second---more than he did first!

So, I suggest, sports writers of America and the world (I know for a fact the British sports writers are as prone to swift judgements, maybe even more so than their Yankee counterparts), the king is not dead. Be ready to wax ecstatic with purple hyperbolic prose again when the Tiger starts to prowl! He'll burn bright again!

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

ATTENTION: SMALL CONDOS FOR SALE (MAYBE)!

Little did my wife and I realize when we built a home in Sanibel, Florida six and a half years ago, having already owned a beachfront condo there for thirty-odd years, that we would be going into the condo business. But here we are, with at least five new condos, albeit very tiny, on our home property. The construction company, an Equal Opportunity Employer using both male and female, is hard at work. And it seems to be a two-person team.

Right next to our house stands a tall palm tree which unfortunately was blighted by some fungus infection that killed it. We were contemplating its removal when, to our surprise and delight, a pair of pileated woodpeckers discovered this prime property and are in process of building several furnished apartments therein in the form of five deep holes stuffed with nesting straw! I don't know if they have a family stashed away some where waiting for the construction to be completed, or if this pair are preparing to do the wild thing to populate it. You have to admire their good taste in choosing a site right on a golf course, only half mile from the Gulf of Mexico---a really prime location. Plus, to really clinch the deal, we've got a swimming pool.

So, if you're interested in a small condo, come on down: we can negotiate terms, but, I want to warn you in advance, pileated woodpeckers are very territorial and will not brook competition lightly. In fact, I think you would be well advised, on second thought, to let well enough alone and leave the condos to them.

The construction is proceeding at a rapid pace. Stay tuned: we'll keep you posted!

Saturday, May 2, 2009

CHARLIE WILSON---YOU WERE RIGHT---I HOPE!

Back in the early fifties (yes, unfortunately, I'm old enough to remember that period!), President Dwight David Eisenhower had a Secretary of Defense named Charlie Wilson who had been Chairman and C.E.O. of General Motors, at that time a behemoth of an organization, to paraphrase Shakespeare, bestriding the world like a colossus. With the authority of his high position, he smugly assured us, "As General Motors goes, so goes the country." There were quite a few certitudes back in the fifties, that period of peaceful and steady growth of American economic and political power, and the premier position of G.M. was one of those givens. Wow, was Charlie Wilson right---but not quite as he intended that statement!

It is mindboggling, having lived as long as I, to witness the decline, the degradation, of General Motors, Chrysler and, to a more limited extent, Ford. It is painful when you consider the number of employees this fall from grace affects and the ripple effect it has on so many ancillary companies, nationally and internationally. Did we ever think we would live to see the auto giants nationalized (even, our new President tells us, temporarily)?

President Barack Obama likes to use the image of the nation as a large ocean liner and the inherent difficulty of changing the course of so large an object as a huge ship. In some part, this has been the problem of the auto industry in America: they have been so big and unwieldy and slow to change.

Unfortunately, part of this has to be ascribed to their own arrogance and complacency. "Don't you consumers tell us what to make---we know what is good for you." Of course the public was also complacent and smug; after all ,we had cheap gas, so what the hell does it matter?

The hybrid concept and electric power pioneered especially by the Japanese auto makers is a prime example. Is there engineering so superior to ours? No, but their sense of priorities was superior, and our boys were happy making gas-guzzling SUVs and the like. Now we have to play catch-up.

I am getting tired of being fed the old line about American know-how and ingenuity, second to none. YES, IF WE HAVE THE RIGHT PRIORITIES. LOOK AT 1969 AND THE MOON SHOT. Maybe one of the good things to come out of this world economic crisis is that it is making us reassess those priorities. Let us hope and pray that we start this reevaluation process.

A new start, a new attitude: maybe then what's good for General Motors can be good for the country.

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

MODERATION: THE NEW DIRTY WORD?

I remember the days when I was pleased to call myself "a moderate Republican". Whatever happened to that appelation? What happened was the extreme right wing of the Republican party took over and decided, in their cockiness after the 2004 election, that there was not room for anybody who didn't espouse the sacred principles IN TOTAL of the G.O.P.: fiscal conservatism, pro-life, pro-war in Iraq, unrestrained free markets, et. al. I became increasingly aware that I was not fitting into the Republican corset and was beginning to find it too suffocating. Mind you, I was not quite ready to call myself a Democrat, but I found myself more and more on their side on many issues. The term "independent" still had currency for me.

Now I note that one of the true moderates, Senator Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, has bolted the Republican party, partially for the pragmatic reason that he sees his ass being whipped by a very conservative nominee for Republicans to run against him in the Republican primary and, to some degree, because he finds himself isolated by his disageement with so many of his right-wing peers. Senator Olympia Snow, one of the true Republican moderates, decrying the unnecessary loss of Specter, noted in the New York Times today: "We can't continue to fold our philosophical tent into an umbrella under which only a select few are worthy to stand. Rather, we should view an expansion of diversity within the party as a triumph that will broaden our appeal." AMEN.

A party that today stands as strictly ANTI and offers no true PRO solutions to the economic crisis of today and limits its membership only to those who totally espouse their every principle is doomed to fail. It is incumbent upon a party in opposition to offer an alternative plan which offers their version of solutions, those positive actions to make things happen.

Until the Republican party offers solutions and not just criticism, they have lost me---and. I'm sure, a lot of others who at one time were unashamed of being termed moderates. Any resemblance to the G.O.P. I once knew is purely coincidental. Has "moderation" become a dirty word? Funny, I thought it had more than four letters!